Hello again, Everyone.
Most tragically, I've only been able to lurk in the lead up to the release but I've so loved seeing everyone's posts/speculations/squees and now that the book is out so fun to catch up on all the omgs/did you notices/can you believes and, of course, speculations. :)
I've got two questions I wanted to ask the comm. If I missed them elsewhere please do point me in the right direction (thanks so much to the folks organizing discussions with links! that is so awesome!).
1. Why are Mede gods helping Kamet remain with Costis which helps Gen/Little Peninsula?
2. In The Mary Sue interview I was ecstatic to see a question I have always wanted to ask MWT: "TMS: Thus far the Queen’s Thief novels have focused almost entirely on men. Do you have any plans to a book exclusively from a female perspective?" I was quite honestly shocked to hear that MWT does not agree her stories are "focused entirely on men or even almost entirely on men" because I'm sorry but her stories are focused almost entirely on men. Has anyone else been curious about this? Wanted different POVs or at least more women characters? Do you agree/disagree that the stories are focused almost entirely on men.
And before I go huge thanks for that "pay the fastener" explanation as I completely missed it. Sounis rocks!
Most tragically, I've only been able to lurk in the lead up to the release but I've so loved seeing everyone's posts/speculations/squees and now that the book is out so fun to catch up on all the omgs/did you notices/can you believes and, of course, speculations. :)
I've got two questions I wanted to ask the comm. If I missed them elsewhere please do point me in the right direction (thanks so much to the folks organizing discussions with links! that is so awesome!).
1. Why are Mede gods helping Kamet remain with Costis which helps Gen/Little Peninsula?
2. In The Mary Sue interview I was ecstatic to see a question I have always wanted to ask MWT: "TMS: Thus far the Queen’s Thief novels have focused almost entirely on men. Do you have any plans to a book exclusively from a female perspective?" I was quite honestly shocked to hear that MWT does not agree her stories are "focused entirely on men or even almost entirely on men" because I'm sorry but her stories are focused almost entirely on men. Has anyone else been curious about this? Wanted different POVs or at least more women characters? Do you agree/disagree that the stories are focused almost entirely on men.
And before I go huge thanks for that "pay the fastener" explanation as I completely missed it. Sounis rocks!
Nevermind on Q1
Date: 5/28/17 06:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 5/28/17 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 5/28/17 04:19 pm (UTC)1: We covered the gods quite a bit in the JDS thread as well (which is where my thoughts on the matter are) and there was also the Hands of the Gods post like you said.
2: I think to understand this you first have to note Megan saying she still thinks Eugenides is the main character despite his absence during the past few books.
I agree with Megan on both her observations that Eugenides is still the MC and women have had a significant impact on the story and their voices have been heard.
As a woman, I love to read stories told from women's perspective, and I would argue Megan has told parts of the story from Irene's and Helen's perspective. Other female characters, who may not have gotten a ton of screen time, but who's actions still have a major impact on the story include: Phresine, Agape, "Sandy," Heiro, Moira, Ina, Lela, and even Hephestia.
Sure Megan hasn't written a book entirely with a female narrator, but that doesn't negate the females we've been shown who are all unique and wonderful nor the fact that she's addressed misogyny and that it was not once but twice the cause of a major villain's downfall.
I also think much of Megan's inspiration for writing are the stories she grew up with, which largely feature male characters on quests/adventures and that has had an impact on her choice of narrator. I'm sure Megan will write a book with a female first-person narrator one of these days, but if it's her preference to write from a male perspective that's her prerogative and her choice as an author.
Having a preference isn't the same as deliberately keeping woman out of stories or avoiding them as narrators because of sexist beliefs. (Looking at you Marvel.) If that were Megan's intent, she wouldn't have written the two most competent leaders in the story as women.
MWT's books are far more feminist than a story with a female MC who fights crime in a leather bikini and is mainly there for fanservice.
no subject
Date: 5/28/17 05:41 pm (UTC)2) ^What Lady Jane (ninedaysaqueen) said.
re:"Pay the fastener"... This is about the only thing I caught on my first read. 0:)
no subject
Date: 5/28/17 07:14 pm (UTC)I would also add that Megan, clearly does not see her narrators as the most important person in the story.
KoA is clearly about Costis AND Gen even though Gen doesn't narrate that story just as QoA is about Irene and her character development.
For example, even though Watson narrates most of the Sherlock Holmes stories, the titular character is the driving force of the plot. (But Watson is important too!)
no subject
Date: 5/28/17 08:59 pm (UTC)Hear hear!
~Helen
no subject
Date: 5/28/17 09:08 pm (UTC)About #2, I was also a bit surprised to read that. I love the variety and realness of her characters and the individuality and/or agency they get in almost every circumstance, but her stories are definitely mostly about men, as more of the major characters are male and the narrative power in at least 3/5 of the books* sits entirely with them. I don't want the books that exist to be different in that respect, because I love them so much as they are, but mwt has proven again and again that one of the things she's amazing at is developing previously minor characters (Attolia, Kamet, Relius, Teleus, Sophos 2.0 I suppose...). I would love books from Agape, Heiro, Ina, Thalia, or Laela's point of view, but then I would love more books from ANY point of view... Anyway, yeah, her storytelling decisions wrt gender and focus make sense, and I love the resulting stories, but they are still decisions, which are always affected in some way by conventions and biases.
By the way, I'm holding out for that Gitta Kingsdaughter novel that's apparently definitely not happening. IT WOULD BE SO COOL!
*as in "who gets to tell the story" of TT, KoA, and TaT.
no subject
Date: 5/28/17 10:21 pm (UTC)This! Been following Shannon Hale's twitter quite often lately (though I'm not on Twitter), and it's amazing how aware she is of this whole issue. Like you said, I wouldn't want the books to be any other way, but just because I love them, it doesn't mean that I get to pretend they're /not/ about men most of the time, you know? And there's nothing wrong with that, I like her male characters. They're cool. And I also agree with the list of female characters you wrote above; I'd personally really really want to see a book from Ina's POV!
no subject
Date: 5/29/17 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 5/29/17 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 5/29/17 09:50 pm (UTC)Thanks for the JDS tip; I hadn't found the Mede gods discussions there so I'll go back and have a look.
I think everything you've said is true at the same time that I think it's true these books are mostly focused on men. I think agh really nailed my view on it: I also love these stories and I love her characters. I love how even the most minor character is clearly the hero of her/his own story - even if we are only brushing up against that story, but I do still think about those decisions of perspective.
I was interested to see that manderelee mentioned Shannon Hale as since she and MWT were recently in conversation it reminded me of the annual roundup Hale does on animated films. She looks at the 20 top grossing (or something like that) and does % female characters on screen and % female characters with speaking parts. Applying that across this series really highlights that it focuses more on male characters than female. For me, that doesn't say anything regarding quality of story/character (which is obv always high and delightful across the QT series) it just really surprised me that MWT wouldn't think her series is focused in such a way. I just can't agree with her there.
no subject
Date: 5/29/17 09:50 pm (UTC)I was totally laughing at myself about the fastener thing as when it was first mentioned I said to myself "tuck that away to see what comes up" and then - quite literally - it comes up and I was not there (off with Immakuk and Ennikar maybe?). Then I read that comment and of course!
no subject
Date: 5/29/17 09:51 pm (UTC)I think you've really nailed how I responded to that interview question. I added a little bit in a reply above but mostly you said it better than I could have.
Yes, Gitta!!! That would be awesome.
no subject
Date: 5/29/17 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 5/29/17 11:08 pm (UTC)I keep seeing arguments (in general, btw, not exactly in this thread) that it doesn't matter how many female characters there are, so long as the ones that do appear are great characters. And I heartily disagree with that; representation is important to me. It's more important to me to see several female characters who are weak and are shown how they struggle to overcome their flaws, than have a single female character that has everything and does everything and be everything *ahem Vin Venture ahem*. The fact that we even have to defend the need to have female characters sort of already underscores the problem anyway... after all, I haven't seen many debates on whether we should have male characters.
no subject
Date: 5/29/17 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 5/30/17 01:29 am (UTC)How many moives are you gonna make Marvel before you make one with a female lead? I know Joss Wedon said he wanted to make a Black Widow film!The weird thing is that the ratios on Shannon Hale's reports seem to be either sorta equal or mostly all men. I don't think I saw any with mostly all women? It's something like 70% of all movies that have male leads.
Oh, and I do think number of female characters in literature and film does matter in the big picture! Characters like Black Widow, Scarlet Witch, Gamora, and Pepper Pots are great but there are so few female superheros in the Marvel cinamatic universe in general.
I see a massive studio as an entirely different beast than a single book author. If MWT prefers to write about male characters? That's fine! If the Marvel writers who have worked for them so far prefere to write about male superheros, then they can just hire someone who wants to make a Black Widow movie. So, writer preference doesn't play into that equation as much in large studios, who are more concerned about what will make them money than what artists are creativly intererested in. (They are making a Miss Marvel film right now, so progress...)
In YA literature, there are so many more stories told from female perspectives than films. At least, it seems so to me. Enough to start a trend of puffy dress covers. I think QT is one of the few on my favs lists that is almost entirely male POVs. *goes to play with Google for data...
Our sample was limited to the Fall 2014 issue of the Guide, which reviewed all hardcover books published in the first six months of 2014 by U.S. publishers listed in LMP. Mariesa coded each fiction review in the Intermediate and Older Fiction sections for gender of protagonist(s): male, female, both, neither. The numbers for Older (books for 12-18-year-olds) were not surprising, except maybe to that zealot at Bookriot: 65% of the protagonists in YA novels were female, 22% were male, boys and girls shared main-character duties in 13%. I thought the numbers for Intermediate (roughly 9-12-year-olds) would be about the same but NO: 48% boys, 36% girls, 16% both. -Horn Book (http://www.hbook.com/2015/03/blogs/read-roger/gender-by-the-numbers/#_)
Also, HERE (http://booksofamber.com/2014/02/why-i-dont-care-about-the-female-to-male-ratio-in-ya.html) and HERE. (http://ladybusiness.dreamwidth.org/38016.html)
Okay, it's not just me! That's interesting that MG has a much lower ratio... Huh.
no subject
Date: 5/30/17 01:53 am (UTC)But in my 2nd paragraph, I was actually referring to the publishing industry, not the film industry which is another can of worms (and one I'm not as invested in, because I don't watch movies often). As a writer myself, I don't want to take creative license from authors, so I mean, if they think their story works best with a mostly male cast, that's their choice. I don't think we should burden particular writers to cater to our tastes. To add to that, I think some of the responsibility falls on us as readers to ensure we're reading diverse things, things that push us out of our comfort zone anyway. I don't think a single writer or even a single book can do that. So yeah, read MWT, but don't read *just* MWT. We should also read authors who write stories in female perspectives, and like you've sourced, there's a great many choices for that especially in YA.
no subject
Date: 5/30/17 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 5/30/17 02:00 am (UTC)Did you notice the freak out when Rouge One was coming out about how Star Wars was being taken over by female characters? XD
Uh, in what world does four films equal six? Two of which haven't even come out yet. Also, Jyn was one female in a group of men. And even Rey is mostly surrounded by men.
no subject
Date: 5/30/17 02:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 5/30/17 02:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 5/30/17 02:16 am (UTC)1: I think I remember where it is... AHA! (http://ninedaysaqueen.livejournal.com/23909.html?thread=158053#t158053) :D
2: It definitely fair to say these books are largley focused on men. I think part of Megan's reasons for saying what she did is that, from her perspective, her narrators are not the most important characters in her story. Like Eugenides is still the MC even though he hasn't narrated since QoA. In additiona to Irene and Helen, there are great many female characters in QT who could carry thier own book.
Also, I don't mean to be blase about the representation of women in film and literature or that a few are "good enough." I'm much less sensitive about this subject with YA and MG as from the data I linked to in a comment below, representation of far more balanced there compared to film and video games. Movies are comprised of 70% male leads and prime time TV only has 37% females leads from the statistic I've seen.
Honestly, like is the case with Marvel, (http://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/the-avengers-why-marvels-refusal-to-make-a-black-widow-movie-is-a-case-of-depressing-hollywood-sexis-17400) I think a lot of the blame lies with major studios avoiding female leads because they think films focused on women won't turn a profit. Hopefully, the new Star Wars films and other franchises like the Hunger Games will start to sway opinions.
no subject
Date: 5/30/17 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 5/30/17 02:33 am (UTC)Agape is a much more likely POV candidate, if she's sent away to form an alliance and gives us an image of the world from another angle. That'd be a lot of fun, and I can see how it would work with the plot arc: she'd probably have been given an agenda to carry out and she would keep in touch with her connections, so we'd be able to see Gen's plans unfolding.
no subject
Date: 5/30/17 02:35 am (UTC)Mostly, I keep bringing up Marvel. because of how annoyed I am with them. *glares in the general direction of Marvel Studios
YES! (to the last paragraph)
no subject
Date: 6/1/17 09:01 pm (UTC)I thought such was the case, so I've always felt that MWT's books having male protagonists is a good thing in the current market, because generally young male readers don't have as many books with male protagonists to choose from and are less likely to read a book with a female protagonist, whereas female readers are more likely to read books with boy protagonists.
I'm not super well-read in the YA market, but beyond Harry Potter and the Percy Jackson books (off the top of my head), how many other recent YA series out there with male main characters? And how many good ones? (the key point)
Yes!!!
Date: 6/4/17 09:18 pm (UTC)