[identity profile] idiosyncreant.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] queensthief
There are quite a few of us that had to read Queen of Attolia a second time before we could really think it was a good book, before we were converted about Irene really deserving Gen, or forgive MWT for what she did to him.
(My almost-14-y.o. sister's reading it for the first time *fingers crossed*)

This isn't the only book that takes acclimation, even revisiting to be appreciated. 

What books have affected you that way?
Any random stuff the principle applies to? 
(Fries with Ranch, a hit song, realizing that officer dude in Pirates of the Carribean was Prince Humperdink...heh)

I, for one, took an awful long time to truly value Magus Dahling...

Date: 6/13/08 08:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lylassandra.livejournal.com
realizing that officer dude in Pirates of the Carribean was Prince Humperdink

WHAT?

Date: 6/14/08 12:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jade-sabre-301.livejournal.com
It's for moments like this that I have IMDB as one of my links in my search bar...

Wait, no he wasn't. At least not according to IMDB (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001697/). Unless it was an uncredited cameo? But they usually catch those too. ANACHRED EXPLAIN YOURSELF.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] jade-sabre-301.livejournal.com - Date: 6/14/08 08:41 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 6/13/08 08:11 pm (UTC)
twtd: (book with glasses)
From: [personal profile] twtd
There are countless songs that I've had that apply to but not really any books. If I don't like a book there's normally a definite reason and rereading it won't change that. A Tale of Two Cities was actually less compelling the second time that I read it. I didn't enjoy or appreciate Citizen Kane the first time I watched it. I still don't like it but a really good discussion in a film class made me appreciate it.

As for QoA, it actually made me go into KoA with a great deal of trepidation because I thought that QoA was so brilliant. I never went through a period where I disliked it or thought that it was anything less than fantastic.

Date: 6/13/08 08:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowgirlvg.livejournal.com
I'm a film student and I definitely have to agree with you about Citizen Kane. It's a film that you start to appreciate more after more viewings and discussions, though never necesarily like. (Sadly it's practically the holy treasure of the film world. You can't take a film class without at least talking about it.) I've already seen it several times and there'll probably be more before I get my degree.

As for the Queen, I didn't understand it the first time I read it. I think I was too young at the time. But just last year I found the King and thought it was the best thing ever, so I re-read Thief and Queen and...well I'm in this community aren't I?

Date: 6/13/08 09:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philia-fan.livejournal.com
I agree that music is this way more often with me than books. Especially music I have to perform that I didn't choose. Sometimes I'll start out thinking, "Why this?" and by concert time I'm in love with it.

QoA, on the other hand, had my heart and my admiration on the first reading -- at least once I got past the you-know-what.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] jade-sabre-301.livejournal.com - Date: 6/14/08 12:18 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thelasteddis.livejournal.com - Date: 9/25/08 04:58 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] checkers65477.livejournal.com - Date: 9/25/08 09:00 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 6/13/08 10:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] checkers65477.livejournal.com
Queen didn't strike me that way, either. I thought it was brilliant from the beginning.

Fire and Hemlock, OTOH, took a rereading before I liked it. I thought it was very well done, but it took a second reading to really grow on me.

Date: 6/13/08 11:02 pm (UTC)
cleo: A crop of the cover of The Great Gatsby (Gatsby)
From: [personal profile] cleo
Hmmm. I loved QOA the first time I read it. It took acclimation for me to like The Thief.

The book that I really had to reread to appreciate was The Great Gatsby. It's such a deep and complex text; I just could not understand that when I read it in high school.

Date: 6/13/08 11:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rj-anderson.livejournal.com
I strongly disliked Mary Stewart's Touch Not The Cat when I first read it at the age of twelve, as well as another of her suspense novels, The Ivy Tree, which I read a few years later.

Now I think both of them are brilliant.

Date: 6/14/08 01:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] checkers65477.livejournal.com
I loved The Ivy Tree! I've managed to find several of Stewart's books at used bookstores recently, but not those two. Just reread Nine Coaches Waiting. *sigh*

Date: 6/17/08 11:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peggy-2.livejournal.com
That was true for me with The Ivy Tree, and now it's high on my list of favorite M Stewart books, but I never went back and gave Touch Not The Cat another try. Hmmm. Perhaps I should do that.

Thanks for the tip!

Date: 6/13/08 11:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rosaleeluann.livejournal.com
It took a re-read for me to like The Hero and the Crown, but I don't think that it was so much the need for second exposure as it was that I was just was too young to really get it the first time. (I was about eleven.)

And Queen.... well, to be completely honest (don't, like, hurt me or anything) but I didn't absolutely love Thief or Queen the first time I read them. Thief I liked well enough I guess, but I hit Queen right in the middle of a readers slump (we can blame that!) and I just simply wasn't in love with it. I liked it enough to finish, and that was that.

Fast forward two months. (It was only two months? It seemed longer than that.) I read King. OHMYGOODNESSITWASSOAMAZING. I read it five times in a row. I went and got Theif and Queen and read them. Why hadn't they been that amazing the first time?

Darn readers slump.

Date: 6/14/08 12:17 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Jane Eyre was like that for me--read it once and thought it was okay, read it a second time and liked it a whole lot better.

(This is off topic: I recently read Eva Ibbotson's novel The Morning Gift, and thought I'd recommend it here. There are occasionally times when you would badly like to smack the main characters, but it's a good and funny book. Historical romance of WW2, paleontology, snark, and, of course, true love. I enjoyed it.)

~Feir Dearig

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] jade-sabre-301.livejournal.com - Date: 6/14/08 12:19 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] octopirock.livejournal.com - Date: 6/14/08 04:56 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 6/14/08 12:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jade-sabre-301.livejournal.com
A Great and Terrible Beauty is the first one that comes to my mind, because the first time I read it I thought it was okay, but the second time I understood everything a LOT better (partially because I had already read it once) and it was much more enjoyable.

Actually, KoA was like that too. I didn't like it as much the first time around--I didn't get what it was supposed to be doing, and I was afraid Gen was like deathly ill or had amnesia or something and who the heck was this Costis guy and why was he interfering with the story? And then I came to Sounis, read some people's musings, went back and reread it--and, partially because I knew how it ended and could see what it was building up to, I LOVED it. It's still a hard one for me to read, as I just discovered on this latest rereading--holding all the strands of "and this is how this is going to turn out and this is why this other things matters" is really difficult! Which is why it is so brilliant.

QoA, on the other hand, has always been perfect. :-)

Date: 6/14/08 01:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] checkers65477.livejournal.com
Very, very well said, jade. EXACTLY how I felt, too.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] emerald-happy.livejournal.com - Date: 6/14/08 11:38 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] vaireweaver.livejournal.com - Date: 6/14/08 05:15 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 6/14/08 01:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philia-fan.livejournal.com
Actually, I've come to learn that with most Great Literature-type books, I need not so much to reread them as just to get past the first 200 pages. Thought I would never get through Middlemarch, until I passed the 200 mark, and then suddenly it was terrific -- but this has happened with many classic novels. They require a little faith.

OH! Here's an example that few may know: Men of Maize, by Miguel Angel Asturias (he won the Nobel prize). Absolutely brilliant, but the first hundred pages make no sense until you've read the rest of the book. We read it in my book group, and the group divided clearly into two factions: those that couldn't finish it, and those who finished it and thought it was one of the most amazing things we'd ever read.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] vaireweaver.livejournal.com - Date: 6/14/08 05:19 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] agentmaly.livejournal.com - Date: 6/26/08 06:06 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 6/14/08 05:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopirock.livejournal.com
The Subtle Knife. I loved The Golden Compass, but every time I started tSK I couldn't get past the first 50 pages. After reading tGC 7 or 8 times I tried again on audiobook, managed to get though it, but wasn't thrilled. After I read (and loved) The Amber Spyglass I went back and tried again, and realized I liked it after all.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] octopirock.livejournal.com - Date: 6/14/08 07:09 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] jade-sabre-301.livejournal.com - Date: 6/14/08 08:43 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 6/14/08 05:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adalanne.livejournal.com
I honestly can't think of a book I disliked that I've ever reread. Seriously, I liked QoA. If I hadn't, I wouldn't have read KoA and just tried to pretend The Thief was the only book in the series.

Maybe y'all are just a lot more forgiving than I am. ^_^

Date: 6/14/08 08:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emmaco.livejournal.com
I'm sure this has happened more than once (though not with QoA, I adored that from the start) but one example I remember is Steven Brust's books. I had haphazardly read some of his Vlad Taltos novels and thought they were OK, but when I decided to go back and read them in publication order, I was delighted by their wit and Brust's obvious enjoyment at trying out different storytelling styles. Similarly, the first time around I thought his homage to The three musketeers, The phoenix guards, was OK but a bit annoying, but the second time around I thought it was brilliant!

Date: 6/14/08 11:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emerald-happy.livejournal.com
Actually, this happens to me a lot. The first time I read a book that I go on to love, I'm too bewildered to know what to think so I avoid it and it translates into dislike. But the voices in my head make me pick it up again and then I get used to it and love it.

It's happened for MWT, Terry Pratchett books, The Curse of Chalion (Bujold) and Rosemary Sutcliff.

But I tend to reread it a day or two later so I don't know if this counts as as an acclimation period.

Date: 6/14/08 12:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peggy-2.livejournal.com
Any random stuff the principle applies to?

feta cheese. Once I discovered how beautifully it pairs with kalamata olives and Mediterranean cooking my entire perspective changed.

I think it was triggered by reading about the regional food in the Attolia books.

: )

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] traboule.livejournal.com - Date: 6/14/08 07:17 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] philia-fan.livejournal.com - Date: 6/14/08 08:43 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 6/15/08 06:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beatlelove927.livejournal.com
I was much too young when I tried to read Wrinkle in Time. Re-reading it now, I love it!

Date: 6/17/08 03:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladymoon-kora.livejournal.com
I love A Wrinkle in Time! I read it in like second grade and I revisited every year until my copy..died. But no worries, I have a new one now!

Date: 6/15/08 10:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyfox.livejournal.com
I wonder how much the order you read the books in affects how you feel about them. I know several people here read Queen or King first, and I think that would have an effect on how one felt about them, ne? For the record, I read them in order and initially didn't care for Queen. I wouldn't say I disliked it... but I remember a reviewer that struck a chord with me when she describe dthe three books something like "My cup of tea" (Theif) "My cup of tea with shards of glass in the bottom" (QoA) and "THE PERFECT cup of tea" (KoA). That more or less matched my initial assessment.


More (lengthy) ruminations follow:

For myself, I was also probbly much older when I first read the books than most peeps here and maybe that had an affect as well. I purchased Theif on a whim my last half of university because it looked nominally interesting, was on sale, and had won a newberry. (As an English-teacher-to-be I thought I had an obligation to read Newberries or something). It didn't interest me enough to read it right away though, not for another year or so, when I was on a business trip, and desperate for something to read. I had finished the other book I'd brought with me, and though I doubted Theif could compare I cracked it open and.... Omigosh! I liked it better than the book I'd been INTERESTED in! It quickly became a favorite of mine. I raved about it. About it's structure, about the twist, about the writing.

When I heard there was a sequel out I was very "mleh" about it as I thought the Theif hadn't really needed a sequel, and sequels tend not to be as good. Then King came out and I figured I might as well give the sequels a shot, though how they could possibly compare was beyond me. (It may not have helped that my libraries copy of queen was the hideous cover. I would like to think that I don't jusdge a book by it's cover but... c'mon, don't we all to some degree? In any case it couldn't have helped.)

I found myself pleasantly surprised by the writing at first, and then Gen got his hand chopped and both my attention and emotions were utterly engaged. At least right up until Gen confessed his love.

I didn't buy it. Not that I thought Gen was lying mind you... it's just that my credulity, which I can usually surpress or at least ignore past slightly wonky plot bits in a book, completely snapped. My suspension of disbelief shattered. The cynical part of my brain saw characterization being pushed aside for profit. Afterall, how could Gen go from feeling as he had expressed in the first book (and that was BEFORE she'd taken his hand), to loving her. (This is another reason I wonder if order would affect perception. Those who read Queen or King first are not introduced to Irene through Gen's vitriolic thoughts about her). I kept reading though, and his explanation that back then he had thought she must be a fiend to make him feel that way about her mollified me a little, but it was like a bandaid over a gaping wound.

I loved MWT's twist at the end of Theif. IT was perfect because the groundwork was there for it all along, when you went back and re-read it it was so obvious, you wondered you hadn't picked up on it before. Part of me said that Queen was the same... but my partial skim back didn't convince me. In anycase I finished and moved on to King, which almost made up for Queen because it was so so so very perfect, it made me WANT to like queen. So I re-read it fully. Nope, still didn't buy it. I found I had to just... ignore the fact that yes, it was completely implausible for Gen to love her in Queen, and just accept that it was reality so I could wallow in my happy place (King.)

About a year later I read it a third time. This time.... I could begin to see the groundwork. It was much MUCH more subtle than what she laid in Theif which is perhaps why I missed it the first two times. I still feel slight twinges in my SoD, but they are more around thngs like... Why would Irene settle for cutting his hand off? and How on Earth did she come to love him back?

Date: 6/17/08 03:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladymoon-kora.livejournal.com
I know what you mean about QoA and Irene's feelings. I always buy it when I read KoA, but when I go back and reread QoA I just get angry and hate Irene again (I have strong feelings about books, and especially about Gen). I have trouble beleiving Irene's feelings and especially Gen's feelings, but I eventually do end up finding the base of the change of heart. But you're right, the reasons in QoA are...less obvious (for lack of a better term) than in The Theif. Still, all of them are great!

nitpicky

From: [identity profile] checkers65477.livejournal.com - Date: 6/17/08 02:40 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: nitpicky

From: [identity profile] ladymoon-kora.livejournal.com - Date: 6/17/08 11:30 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: nitpicky

From: [identity profile] checkers65477.livejournal.com - Date: 6/18/08 12:51 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 6/15/08 11:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyfox.livejournal.com
Just realized I didn't answer the original question. Though I will no doubt draw down the disdain of Jade and others in this group, I would have to say that another book I came to appreciate more after a reread was New Moon, book two in Meyer's Twilight Saga.

I liked Twilight. A LOT. I recognized that it wasn't the best written thing ever. It was obviously a freshman effort, but I thought the plot made up for the unpolished writing, and I liked the characters and how Edward and Bella's relationship unfolded. Loved it in fact. Loved even more that here was a vampire book (a genre I had always been fascinated by, but afraid to read), in which sex was not a major focus. And in fact, a large part of their relationship was defined by the fact that they couldn't go there.

New Moon I felt rather the opposite about. The writing was a lot more polished, but I didn't like the characters near as much (I wanted to slap Bella and Edward each repeatedly), and several parts strained my disbelief. (He automatically assumed he was dead? Really? The voice in her head was just herself knowing that he loved her? Really?)

I had mediumish feelings about Eclipse. Several things bothered me in it, but New Moon had already drained the series of joy for me so....

I won't say that I LIKED New Moon after giving it a second skim through.... but I did APPRECIATE it more and tolerate it better so.... I guess that counts for something.

Date: 6/16/08 12:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladymoon-kora.livejournal.com
Actually, it's funny that you're bringing this up, 'cause I did I funny thing when I read The Thief. I read it a few years ago and I loved it sooo much, but parts of it seemed familiar for some reason, and for the longest time I couldn't figure out why, and then I went to MWT's website and looked at other covers of the book and realized that a year or so before that I had read the first half of The Thief and put it down for some reason (I still haven't forgiven myself). So when asked in what order I read the books, I usually say I read QoA first because I finished it first. Anyway, I liked it a lot better the second time through, but then I wasn't an idiot sixth grader the second time. And it took me a long time after reading and rereading QoA and KoA before I could forgive Irene for cutting off Gen's hand and then marrying him. That really got me the first time.

But I don't know about other books, because if I don't like them the first time, I usually don't read them again (thankfully I didn't realize I was rereading The Thief).

Date: 6/17/08 04:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aspectabund.livejournal.com
I did something similar with a Pratchett book. I had started reading the Truth, and I found myself wondering where I'd heard the opening before. I concluded that I had taken it out of the library once, read the first few pages, then forgot about it and just brought it back. Oh, things are silly.

Date: 6/17/08 04:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aspectabund.livejournal.com
This isn't quite the same thing, but the first time I watched Monty Python, I was perhaps eleven, and found tit just as hilarious as I do now. However, I didn't get the whole "You silly Eenglish ki-nig-its." I thought it was just making up a word or something. And so, since misconceptions acquired when young follow you into adulthood, it took me until last year to have the epiphany that John Cleese was just giving "knights" a ridiculous pronunciation. Dur.

Date: 6/17/08 04:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aspectabund.livejournal.com
"tit" =/= "it". But it is a good spelling mistake.

Date: 6/17/08 09:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beatlelove927.livejournal.com
THe first time I saw Monty Python, I didnt laugh at all. It just wasnt funny. But the next few (hundred) times, I loved it. I think I got some more of the inside jokes and apprecaiated it even more when I saw Spamalot.
Page generated Jan. 19th, 2026 04:11 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios