Another layer
Dec. 3rd, 2010 11:20 amSo, we were discussing the infamous "take my wine cup" scene from KoA awhile back and I was thinking about it some more this morning. I came to the sudden realization that there's another metaphorical level too. Basically that scene and the contrast with what happened to Attolia's first husband is a nice little metaphor for the differences between her first and second marriages.
Attolia's first husband marries her against her will and attempts to take her sovereignty as a ruler away from her, just like he takes her food and drink when his own is gone. I don't think it's overstating to say that Attolia hates him on both the personal and political level, so she deals with him by using his greedy desire against him--poisoning him. His grabbing and her, um, reaction symbolize the complete dysfunction of their marriage. (Which lasts for what, a day?)
Now, with Gen it's a bit different. She offers him the cup, not as a warning (although that might be how it seems--I'll get to that in a second), but as a way to lighten his tension and so on. Likewise, by this point she has offered him the sovereignty of the country, despite the kidnapping. In the end she has chosen him--her power remains intact and she is able to offer the wine cup/country.
From the outside Gen and Attolia's first husband seem like they're trying to do the same thing--marry Attolia against her will and get control of the country. So the court might easily interpret Attolia's offering her wine cup to Gen as a threat: you watch it or you'll get what he got. But because the inner circumstances are so different, Attolia's real motive for offering Gen the cup is an expression of the fact that she cares about him. Both their marriage and the wine cup baffle the onlookers who don't understand the true complexities of their relationship, but both are actually rooted in a genuine understanding and love. The first wine cup incident and the first marriage, on the other hand, are quite clearly rooted in greed, dysfunction, and hate.
Opinions, thoughts, disagreements?
Attolia's first husband marries her against her will and attempts to take her sovereignty as a ruler away from her, just like he takes her food and drink when his own is gone. I don't think it's overstating to say that Attolia hates him on both the personal and political level, so she deals with him by using his greedy desire against him--poisoning him. His grabbing and her, um, reaction symbolize the complete dysfunction of their marriage. (Which lasts for what, a day?)
Now, with Gen it's a bit different. She offers him the cup, not as a warning (although that might be how it seems--I'll get to that in a second), but as a way to lighten his tension and so on. Likewise, by this point she has offered him the sovereignty of the country, despite the kidnapping. In the end she has chosen him--her power remains intact and she is able to offer the wine cup/country.
From the outside Gen and Attolia's first husband seem like they're trying to do the same thing--marry Attolia against her will and get control of the country. So the court might easily interpret Attolia's offering her wine cup to Gen as a threat: you watch it or you'll get what he got. But because the inner circumstances are so different, Attolia's real motive for offering Gen the cup is an expression of the fact that she cares about him. Both their marriage and the wine cup baffle the onlookers who don't understand the true complexities of their relationship, but both are actually rooted in a genuine understanding and love. The first wine cup incident and the first marriage, on the other hand, are quite clearly rooted in greed, dysfunction, and hate.
Opinions, thoughts, disagreements?
no subject
Date: 12/3/10 06:44 pm (UTC)That cup is rather symbolic of the power to rule the country. There is that difference between Attolia's first husband who attempted to grab it away from her and Gen, who she offered it to when he didn't want it. Which makes his response rather symbolic as well. "No fear of that, my dear one...I see my cup is full as well."
no subject
Date: 12/3/10 07:13 pm (UTC)The reason I ask is that cups have appeared a lot over the course of the series, like hairpins, inkpots, and earrings. There's the cup that Gen stared into in Eddis after he lost his hand and noticed that the centaurs had "Two hands," which I guess is a symbol for his depression (and segues nicely into his small drinking binge). There's this cup, in KoA.
Then there's the cup Gen smashes in ACoK when he can't get Sophos to treat him as a friend and can't bring himself to do the same. If that one is also symbolic of a country, or a kind of power equality, it might represent Sounis---a country which is up for grabs at the moment---and, specifically, Gen's anger at having to take its sovereignty away from Sophos, thus disrupting the balance of power in their relationship. Which is a little dysfunctional at that point in the book.
no subject
Date: 12/4/10 01:01 am (UTC)The same symbolism carrying through to the next book is an interesting idea. Although if this is the case I would not like to think what the symbolism of Gen deliberately dropping that cup at the end of ACoK might mean.
no subject
Date: 12/4/10 05:36 am (UTC)Huh.
no subject
Date: 12/4/10 02:03 am (UTC)Thinking about the medean cups Melheret and Sophos drink from in ACoK ... Akretenesh seems to be insinuating, when he talks about how they're made by the artisans in his empire, that Sounisian/"barbarian" artistry is inadequate. If you go with the metaphor thing, it could be espressing how, in his stay (and all the other ambassadors') Melheret is brining his OWN culture and techniques to our country trio, not adapting or appreciating what they have there already."Remchik is not for sipping, we say in my home. It's flavor comes in the swallow." He wants to gulp their country.
no subject
Date: 12/4/10 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/3/10 11:05 pm (UTC)But even with the added cup = country/rule layer of meaning, I do not really understand why Gen laughs the way he does. What about this whole thing could be making him happy?
no subject
Date: 12/4/10 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/4/10 02:07 am (UTC)I like your ideas.
no subject
Date: 12/4/10 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/4/10 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/5/10 12:56 am (UTC)It's very common to use humor as a sort of psychological therapy. I do it. Everyone I know does it. It's actually more true to human nature than going hard emo about every thing that's difficult/serious in your life. Laughter doeth good like a medicine, and snarks/humor is essential to keeping yourself sane in stressful situations.
Some may consider this to be a form of denial, or an outlet for bitterness, thus the term sardonic. Either way, I think people who are better at handling difficulties often joke about matters in a slightly morbid manner in order lessen feelings of extremeness of the issues they are dealing with. If you can calm down, you are often more capable of handling them to.
no subject
Date: 12/5/10 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/4/10 10:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/5/10 08:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/5/10 06:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/3/10 07:01 pm (UTC)This has sort of occurred to me in a hazy, unformed, back-brain kind of way, but it's not until you put it in this very articulate essay that I even realized it. I totally agree.
no subject
Date: 12/5/10 08:46 pm (UTC)So many things occur to me like that!
Thank you. (Oh, and love that user pic! And SRB's summary.)
no subject
Date: 12/3/10 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/5/10 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/3/10 07:46 pm (UTC)Anyway, I would agree with this 100%. I think you hit the nail on the head. ^_^
no subject
Date: 12/3/10 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/3/10 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/5/10 08:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/6/10 02:14 am (UTC)"I hate it when the king chews on me."
no subject
Date: 12/3/10 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/5/10 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/4/10 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/5/10 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/4/10 02:08 am (UTC)Can I write my thesis on mwt?
no subject
Date: 12/5/10 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/4/10 05:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/5/10 12:04 am (UTC)First of all, there's Ornon's thoughts framing the scene - where he sees that Eugenides is "angry and pleased to be so", and looks at the queen because he didn't know where else to look. After the incident, he looks at the queen again, and bows his head in respect because "she'd proved her strength".
So there's more than just a joke there - Attolia knew that her court needed to have respect for one of its rulers. She wanted Gen to be king, but as long as he kept refusing, she needed to keep the power. She might have also needed to make a show of Attolian strength, as Eugenides's comments reminded everyone that he was a foreigner.
But MWT says it was a joke of sorts a page later, after the musicians start playing the Eddisian tune that Attolia assumes Gen can't dance to. She says, "Him, I will have flayed" and then feels Gen relax. Then comes "Her statement had been less calculated than her offer of wine, but it had the same effect, easing the strain she knew he felt."
Either he was upset about his cousins - that line about them seeing their dead, and his cousins who were past love and hate - or he was sick of being king, and assumed what Ornon called his Thief face to deal with the embarrassment from the undersecretary. We know it wasn't a threat because we know she loves him, and he knows it as well, and maybe he laughs because he pities the fool who underestimated her, or because she knows he would never do it, so it's his appreciation of her ironic sense of humor - or because he thinks it's funny that she needs to assert her strength despite the fact that she wants him to assert his as king.
no subject
Date: 12/5/10 01:01 am (UTC)Only QT can have this much subtle meaning packed into one... what? five page scene.
no subject
Date: 12/5/10 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/5/10 06:27 am (UTC)I like this.
no subject
Date: 12/5/10 06:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/5/10 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/6/10 02:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/5/10 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/6/10 03:52 am (UTC)~Sommerrev