[identity profile] idiosyncreant.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] queensthief
in hopelessly fannish realms of thought.

Truth is, I'm currently obsessing over "point of view" in narrative, because I'm juggling it in my own writing. But this is all Thief, Queen, King-dom I promise.

I recently was pondering that both QoA and KoA are not written in Gen's voice. That was something that made The Thief so stellar, so delicious. I have inklings about why that is (which I'll post and try to put under a cut below) but what are your opinions on that? Why isn't Gen telling his story anymore? Is it a loss?

I guess the first story is put up as Eugenides's written account to Eddis.
And in some sense, the mystery of not knowing what Gen is up to is kept more in-the-now because we don't see everything that's going on. Obviously, KoA is all about what Costis is seeing, and how he's blindsided by the king's cleverness. But I loved the way Gen was telling the story, but not the whole story, and only unravels it all at the end of the Thief. There is a thrill to hearing it all over again to. I'm reading it aloud to my little brothers, after reading it aloud to my little sister, after rereading it myself all in the last six months, and I'm still laughing over ways we're slyly told what's visible and kept from seeing what's going on.

But [whines] I miss his voice!


I would love to have another story in his POV. Unfortunately, I'm too respectful of the writer to go lobbying for my wants in further installments.

Interested in what the other bookish people about have to say on this. To not put too fine a point on it. (^_^)

Thanks!
Page 1 of 2 << [1] [2] >>

Date: 2/10/07 03:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adalanne.livejournal.com
Well, with QoA, if Gen had been the narrator, we would have known where he was psychologically, and planning-wise, and so something like the wonderful moment where Gen confronts the Magus in Sounis would be completely ruined. In KoA, much the same thing, but even more so because this was a story about not only Gen coming to terms with being king but the people of Attolia coming to terms with it as well. That's why Costis was so key because MWT could use him as a go-between, in the same way as Gen did.

Both books, of course, would have been entirely different if written from Gen's POV, and I'm quite glad MWT made the choices she did. (We would miss so much if we only saw it through Gen! Especially his expressions and child-becoming-a-man-ness.)

But I did so love Gen's voice as well. That's actually why I refused to read QoA, until I discovered that KoA was out and so that there must be at least some merit in the books. I was pleasantly surprised to find I could still love them out of Gen's POV.

Date: 2/10/07 08:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aged-crone.livejournal.com
I like the fact that the stories aren't all told by Gen. Especially as he becomes more and more impressive and powerful, some of it would sound monumentally self-centered and arrogant if it were he who reported it, even if it were at all possible for him to do so. In QoA, for example, he wouldn't be able to describe Attolia's thoughts and feelings, and a large part of the story would be lost. And in KoA - "I lay there looking like a god with the gold bedcover surrounding me" (I can't remember the exact quote); or "I listened at the door after I had left the room, and heard Teleus say, 'He will be an Annux - a king of kings.'"

That's apart from the fact that some of the startling plot twists wouldn't be nearly as startling if Gen were telling it. (Of course, some of them wouldn't have been so startling if I hadn't read KoA first).

Date: 2/10/07 10:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rowana.livejournal.com
The Thief did prove that Gen could be used as a narrator without giving the whole surprise ending away - he doesn't have to be telling us everything all along. I agree, I think that was what really drew us into his character in The Thief, the ability to see all events through his eyes, with his throughts as a running commentary.

That said, I agree with Adalanne and Leslie. QoA and KoA have to be told from his eyes, I don't think Gen could have told any of the events in QoA to quite the same poignancy, and telling the events of KoA from his POV would have been tricky, and may have made him seem arrogant. We may well have gained other things out of his POV, but nothing that we didn't really gen in The Thief, and I think Megan does an excellent job of still allowing us to see Gen's snarky comments through his speech.

I would love to have another story in his POV. Unfortunately, I'm too respectful of the writer to go lobbying for my wants in further installments.

I feel thoroughly disrespectful now, because I think we did so. We sent of a letter to Megan back in March, and I think a possible sequel from Gen's POV may have been one of the questions. Though I could be wrong on this. :)

Date: 2/10/07 11:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philia-fan.livejournal.com
Well, I've mentioned my theory before, but I guess I can trot it out again and bore you all... I feel as if there is a progression in Gen's story, a journey that he takes from (apparently) ordinary thief to legendary figure. And (to repeat myself) that's part of what the stories-within-stories are about, to show us that Gen is becoming someone that tales will be told about -- a hero, a legend, almost godlike. So to me it feels entirely appropriate that the audience is removed a little more from Gen's head with every book. First we hear his voice (though even then he hides things from us). Then we hear a narrator's voice but still visit his thoughts. Then we see him from the eyes of someone who doesn't know him at all. All the while Gen is becoming more and more a public figure, someone who in a sense belongs to other people.
Two other practical points. A good portion of QoA is really about the title character! What I find extraordinary about that book is how the author makes us hate the Queen,then slowly, slowly wins us over until we're rooting for her desperately by the end. I don't think that could have been accomplished from Gen's point of view. And KoA is, in a sense, all about changing someone's mind. How to appreciate that if you don't see the unchanged mind to start with?
Or maybe ALL the books are about changing someone's mind...

Date: 2/10/07 01:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philia-fan.livejournal.com
I think I've said this one before, too, but I also like that the different narrators make each book a unique experience. It's not "Gen and the Magic Stone," "Gen and the Missing Hand" followed by "Gen and the Attolian Guard." Each book has a very distinct, stand-alone flavor, which to me raises it out of the common herd of series books.

Date: 2/10/07 03:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] checkers65477.livejournal.com
One of the reasons Thief is so marvelous is because although it is entirely Eugenides's book (there really are only 5 characters and Gen is always in the action) it manages to fool us so completely. We are *Costis*--we meet Gen and he is annoying and silly, so we underestimate him. And, as Philia said so well, each book is about changing someone's mind.

In Queen we needed to see things that were going on outside of Gen and Eddis, so the book was told from multiple POVs. There was some criticism of that when the book was published, but as Philia said, we needed to become sympathetic to Attolia and couldn't do so from her actions, which were pretty brutal throughout. We had to hear her thoughts. I think the dual POV worked well, and would like to see that again (or more of it; we did see it a bit in King).

By King, we know Gen too well to be fooled and can take delight in Costis and the others seeing him for the first time, knowing that Gen will prevail in the end.

I just noticed your icon. Very nice. :)

Date: 2/10/07 05:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philia-fan.livejournal.com
Go Jane Eyre!

Date: 2/10/07 05:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rowana.livejournal.com
Nice icon checkers. :D

Date: 2/10/07 06:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] checkers65477.livejournal.com
They have shamed me into reading it. Do you suppose they are reading Pride and Prejudice in return? *glares into the Conspiracy Room*

Date: 2/10/07 06:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] checkers65477.livejournal.com
Yes, and there have been several interesting discussions about canon vs. a wet Colin Firth. :)

Date: 2/10/07 06:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rowana.livejournal.com
I'm glad, you jolly well should have read Jane Eyre by now. ;D And I'm sure most of them have already read Pride and Prejudice (and watched it too, judging by the reaction to Jade's wet Colin Firth comments a while ago).

Date: 2/10/07 06:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rowana.livejournal.com
*grins*

Date: 2/10/07 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adalanne.livejournal.com
Nice points. And I've never considered the books as a progression to Gen as a legend; I'll definitely have that in mind next time I read them.

Date: 2/10/07 07:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adalanne.livejournal.com
Oh no, steal away! And I'd be happy to help in any way, though I'm afraid I wouldn't be much help. I'm more of the "have an idea, then fiddle with Photoshop until you get something you like or give up" school of icon-making. But I'll do my best to help with any questions you have.

P&P

Date: 2/10/07 11:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peggy-2.livejournal.com
It's on the list! When I finish the Rosemary Sutcliff books from the library, it will be a priority. Honest!

*goes back to reading Sword at Sunset*

Date: 2/11/07 01:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] checkers65477.livejournal.com
Yes, I truly love the part where he runs from the house, tying his cravat and wondering how he looks, in order to catch Elizabeth as she is leaving in embarassment. *sigh*

Date: 2/11/07 01:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] checkers65477.livejournal.com
*ducks in shame*

next book

Date: 2/11/07 02:24 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I wonder if we will see more of Eddis is the next book. Eugenides seems to have wrapped things up in Attolia-he's finally KING and all that. But the situations in Eddis and Sounis don't seems to be wrapped up at all-Helen might have to marry Sounis, and Sophos is missing-presumed-dead.

The one perspective I would not want to see is Nahuseresh (sp?) but that is just a personal preference...

~Feir Dearig

*confesses to having read P&P and Jane Eyre, but not Wuthering Heights or much Rosemary Suttclif (sp?) at all*
Page 1 of 2 << [1] [2] >>
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 03:48 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios