Why go to war?
Dec. 1st, 2007 12:30 pmI started re-reading the Queen of Attolia the other day. (I think I was feeling rather sorry for myself and wanted to be reminded that—Hey, life could be worse!) As I did I started wondering—How calculated was Eddis’ decision to go to war with Attolia? On the one hand, it seemed like a quick, irrational decision resulting from her anger over Gen’s hand being cut off. On the other hand, it seemed really deliberate.
(Has this been discussed before? If so, tell me. I wasn’t sure where to look to see if it had been.)
(Starts on about pg 82 in my new paperback edition, if you want to look it up.)
Why it seemed quick and irrational—
The ordering of the confiscation of the ten caravans from Attolia. To me, it seemed like she was just so angry she wanted to DO something, so she did the first thing that popped into her head that would make Attolia angry.
“War, then.” I mean, doesn’t that just sound like, “Yeah, I know you’re bigger and stronger and I shouldn’t do it, but, I’m angry, and I’m gonna make you PAY!” And then right after that she opens the reservoir of the Aracthus and sends the raiding party—kinda like she’s saying, “BRING IT!!”
Eddis is so much smaller, and surrounded by two bigger countries that would ally against her--did she really think she would win? Was there a possibility in the beginning that it wouldn't be a war they couldn't win but might survive, and somehow they missed a chance at some essential point?
Why it seemed deliberate and calculated—
Eddis just always seems deliberate and knowledgeable and in control. She’s just that way. (I want to be Eddis when I grow up.)
Her suggestion of arbitration by the Court of the Ten Nations. She seems to be trying to avoid a war, right? Or maybe shes thinking that what she did before was a bit hasty and she’s trying to gracefully back out…?
She buys the grain surplus before people figure out what is going on. I mean, that’s a deliberate, rational action. She bought most of it before the ultimatum from Attolia. Was she planning for war?
The ministers council voted unanimously for war. I mean, they all wanted to do it. But I guess this could go up in the other column as well, and they were ALL being angry and irrational… *shrug*
Was she counting on Gen snapping out of his self pity to help with one of hisstupid plans professional risks earlier? No, she couldn’t be… but she does tell him, basically, to snap out of it and be helpful now that he knows whats going on.
What do you think?
(Has this been discussed before? If so, tell me. I wasn’t sure where to look to see if it had been.)
(Starts on about pg 82 in my new paperback edition, if you want to look it up.)
Why it seemed quick and irrational—
The ordering of the confiscation of the ten caravans from Attolia. To me, it seemed like she was just so angry she wanted to DO something, so she did the first thing that popped into her head that would make Attolia angry.
“War, then.” I mean, doesn’t that just sound like, “Yeah, I know you’re bigger and stronger and I shouldn’t do it, but, I’m angry, and I’m gonna make you PAY!” And then right after that she opens the reservoir of the Aracthus and sends the raiding party—kinda like she’s saying, “BRING IT!!”
Eddis is so much smaller, and surrounded by two bigger countries that would ally against her--did she really think she would win? Was there a possibility in the beginning that it wouldn't be a war they couldn't win but might survive, and somehow they missed a chance at some essential point?
Why it seemed deliberate and calculated—
Eddis just always seems deliberate and knowledgeable and in control. She’s just that way. (I want to be Eddis when I grow up.)
Her suggestion of arbitration by the Court of the Ten Nations. She seems to be trying to avoid a war, right? Or maybe shes thinking that what she did before was a bit hasty and she’s trying to gracefully back out…?
She buys the grain surplus before people figure out what is going on. I mean, that’s a deliberate, rational action. She bought most of it before the ultimatum from Attolia. Was she planning for war?
The ministers council voted unanimously for war. I mean, they all wanted to do it. But I guess this could go up in the other column as well, and they were ALL being angry and irrational… *shrug*
Was she counting on Gen snapping out of his self pity to help with one of his
What do you think?
no subject
Date: 12/1/07 09:53 pm (UTC)If Gen had died, would Eddis have started a war?
I like your reasoning for both arguements!
~Feir Dearig
no subject
Date: 12/1/07 10:38 pm (UTC)That's the same reason I keep using to re-read it! I dislocated my knee earlier this year and it was sort of soothing to think, "well, at least I still have both hands, even if I can't walk."
I'd always thought she'd planned the whole thing in advance. The caravans seem like a surprise, but I bet she'd been thinking what to do ever since she got word of what happened to Gen - or that's what I assumed. She's a devious lady, Eddis.
I think she was planning for war, partly because of Gen and partly just because she was behind a regime change in Attolia anyway, so the grain buy-up might have been an unspecific future planning and then Gen's injury provided a very useful political catalyst. She probably knew no one would take her seriously when she suggested the 10 Nations.
LOVE the icon!
no subject
Date: 12/1/07 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/1/07 10:54 pm (UTC)It also sounded a bit, at least to me, that she was looking for an EXCUSE to go to war...
no subject
Date: 12/1/07 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/1/07 11:04 pm (UTC)But then again, this could be because I KNOW that they end up in a somewhat desperate situation later... hmm.
*ponders*
no subject
Date: 12/1/07 11:05 pm (UTC)She does lose her temper, but the injury to Gen is more than personal. Gen was the Thief that gave Eddis an irrefutable claim to the throne. Therefore cutting off his hand is an insult to Eddis's sovereignty. Ignoring it would be a sign of weakness.
no subject
Date: 12/2/07 02:23 am (UTC)(Though when Eddis said that she'd been thinking about deposing Attolia, I'm not sure if she meant she'd starting having those thoughts before or after Eugenides' hand was cut off. Hmm...)
no subject
Date: 12/2/07 02:34 am (UTC)You know? I bet the one thing she hadn't expected was losing Gen as an asset. I'm guessing that the virtuoso feat of stealing Hamiathes' Gift out from under the noses of both Sounis and Attollia twice pretty well convinced most of Eddis (and Sounis) that Gen could get away with pretty much anything. And the queen, more than anyone else, knew he was favored by the gods.
no subject
Date: 12/2/07 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/2/07 09:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/2/07 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/2/07 02:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/2/07 02:04 pm (UTC)(at least that's how I remember it)
no subject
Date: 12/2/07 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 12/5/07 03:58 pm (UTC)[joins the icon-love conga-line.]
no subject
Date: 10/26/12 07:51 am (UTC)