I recently noticed a particular exchange in The King of Attolia that doesn't make very much sense. At least not yet.
"This could have been one of you, though," said Eugendies, running a finger along a short white ridge near the hollow of his shoulder. He looked at Teleus. "Was it?"
The captain shook his head.
"You transferred him? Are you worried about my taste in revenge?'
"Should I be?" Teleus asked bluntly.
"Not for that," said the king.
page 378-379 of The King of Attolia
It seems whoever gave Eugendies this scar on his shoulder is an Attolian guardsmen or palace employee of some sort that Teleus transferred to protect. Perhaps, it happened when Eugendies was held prisoner in Attolia, because he asks "Was it?" like he does not know the identity of the person. I went through the beginning of The Queen of Attolia, and can't find any person in particular who was mentioned striking/wounding Eugendies on the shoulder severaly enough to leave a lasting scar.
So the questions are...
Who is this person, exsactly?
Why did they hit/wound Eugendies on the shoulder?
Why would Teleus want to protect them?
Also, Eugendies says he wouldn't take revenge for "that". Is this a reference to the scar or something else?
I can't figure this one out on my own, and would like some opinions.
What's going on here?
"This could have been one of you, though," said Eugendies, running a finger along a short white ridge near the hollow of his shoulder. He looked at Teleus. "Was it?"
The captain shook his head.
"You transferred him? Are you worried about my taste in revenge?'
"Should I be?" Teleus asked bluntly.
"Not for that," said the king.
page 378-379 of The King of Attolia
It seems whoever gave Eugendies this scar on his shoulder is an Attolian guardsmen or palace employee of some sort that Teleus transferred to protect. Perhaps, it happened when Eugendies was held prisoner in Attolia, because he asks "Was it?" like he does not know the identity of the person. I went through the beginning of The Queen of Attolia, and can't find any person in particular who was mentioned striking/wounding Eugendies on the shoulder severaly enough to leave a lasting scar.
So the questions are...
Who is this person, exsactly?
Why did they hit/wound Eugendies on the shoulder?
Why would Teleus want to protect them?
Also, Eugendies says he wouldn't take revenge for "that". Is this a reference to the scar or something else?
I can't figure this one out on my own, and would like some opinions.
What's going on here?
no subject
Date: 4/14/09 09:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 4/14/09 10:01 am (UTC)Was Teleus the captain leading the party that captured the Magus's group? Was it Teleus, maybe?
no subject
Date: 4/14/09 10:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 4/14/09 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 4/15/09 04:21 am (UTC)Kitsune_rain started a whole discussion about that. It can be viewed under the Hamaithes's Gift search tag.
no subject
Date: 4/14/09 10:33 am (UTC)Teleus is in charge of troop disposition now whether he was in charge of that particular party or not (which I doubt, or the conversation would probably be more personal). It's his job to keep the guard running as smoothly as possible, and that definitely includes keeping potential problems out of the way, and it makes sense to view a guard member who nearly killed the new ruler as a potentially very serious problem.
Gen has the ability to be rather vindictive, if not quite in a way that Teleus understands at this point (earrings? Ornon's sheep?), and Teleus doesn't know that Gen's had nightmares about the soldier he killed. If you look at the situation with Dite without full knowledge of what Gen was doing and why, it can look like the King is banishing him as revenge for causing the king embarrassment.
no subject
Date: 4/14/09 10:48 am (UTC)Thank you.
no subject
Date: 4/14/09 11:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 4/14/09 10:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 4/14/09 12:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 4/14/09 03:50 pm (UTC)He didn't think to take revenge against the torturer who cut off his hand; he does want revenge against Nahuseresh.
no subject
Date: 4/14/09 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 4/14/09 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 4/15/09 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 4/14/09 09:38 pm (UTC)'I nearly had them killed, every single one of them, garotted, gutted, and dead.' - p. 296, KoA
But he didn't, and I agree with Philia as to why.
no subject
Date: 4/15/09 12:20 am (UTC)He does have a nasty temper, but one of the fun things about the series for me is how we see his learning to control his temper in The Thief and the subsequent effects in further books -- his growing into more control with greater responsibilities, where expressing his temper could do much more damage.
I basically agree with Philia, but I think the point is more that he is usually well able to see who is ultimately responsible for things and he doesn't begrudge people for following orders.
no subject
Date: 4/14/09 08:07 pm (UTC)Gen would never take revenge against somebody who was just doing their job.
no subject
Date: 4/14/09 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 8/5/09 02:29 am (UTC)