I have to admit that when I read QoA, I didn't realize that the cannon the Eddisians took with them on their way to steal the queen were wooden until Eugenides told Attolia so. I am comforted by the belief that this was deliberate misdirection by the author rather than me being egregiously stupid. I was just re-reading that part again, and noticed how tricky a comma can be.
The book says, "Those in the rear struggled with block and tackle, roughly squared wooden beams, wooden carriages and cannon." Which of course means "wooden carriages and wooden cannon." If it had said "wooden carriages, and cannon," it wouldn't have. But when reading through it for the first time I didn't even notice the absence of the comma, and automatically assumed that cannon = metal. Brilliant writing! Brilliant, sneaky, writing!
Speaking of misdirection: Since I read QoA last of the three, I knew what happened. Somebody who read the books in the proper order, please tell me: in the scene where Eugenides proposes stealing the Queen of Attolia, did you get the idea through most of the discussion that what he was planning was to kill her? Until the very end when Eddis said, "All right, go and steal the queen of Attolia? (And I still can't quite figure out if he announced in open Council, "By the way, I want to marry her because I love her." Or did Eddis just figure it out for herself?)
I spend a lot of my re-reading time smacking myself in the head and saying, "Well, of course! How obvious! How could I have missed that?"
Leslie
The book says, "Those in the rear struggled with block and tackle, roughly squared wooden beams, wooden carriages and cannon." Which of course means "wooden carriages and wooden cannon." If it had said "wooden carriages, and cannon," it wouldn't have. But when reading through it for the first time I didn't even notice the absence of the comma, and automatically assumed that cannon = metal. Brilliant writing! Brilliant, sneaky, writing!
Speaking of misdirection: Since I read QoA last of the three, I knew what happened. Somebody who read the books in the proper order, please tell me: in the scene where Eugenides proposes stealing the Queen of Attolia, did you get the idea through most of the discussion that what he was planning was to kill her? Until the very end when Eddis said, "All right, go and steal the queen of Attolia? (And I still can't quite figure out if he announced in open Council, "By the way, I want to marry her because I love her." Or did Eddis just figure it out for herself?)
I spend a lot of my re-reading time smacking myself in the head and saying, "Well, of course! How obvious! How could I have missed that?"
Leslie
no subject
Date: 11/10/06 10:28 am (UTC)i read QoA, then KoA, then Thief. well i wasn't really thinking very hard when reading QoA, i was just reading. so i never pondered over what Gen wanted to do to Attolia. it didn't help that i couldn't resist the temptation and read the ending first of all... ;)
no subject
Date: 11/11/06 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 11/10/06 11:50 am (UTC)One of my recent head-smacking moments was Attolia waking in the middle of the night, looking at the shadows in her room and realizing she's not sure she wants the shadows to be empty. I just don't remember that paragraph being there from the first ten readings... Or maybe it's Attolia who should be doing the head-smacking. Get with it, honey! You're in love with that guy that used to hide in your room!
-Philia
no subject
Date: 11/10/06 03:37 pm (UTC)Psychiatrist smacks patient one upside the head. "Get with it, honey! You're in love with the man! Now, while we're at it, you want to talk about this defensive mechanism where you keep dwelling on how young he is?"
Leslie, who suspects she's posting way too much but is having so much fun...
no subject
Date: 11/10/06 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 11/10/06 04:51 pm (UTC)-Philia
no subject
Date: 11/10/06 04:52 pm (UTC)-P.
no subject
Date: 11/10/06 05:46 pm (UTC)That's an excellent observation! Wow. Very good :)
no subject
Date: 11/10/06 06:10 pm (UTC)Hand written?
Bwahahahahaha!
Leslie
no subject
Date: 11/11/06 12:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 11/10/06 01:40 pm (UTC)Hmm, thing is, I'm pretty sure we discussed this on the comm ages ago. I'll re-read and take a look in the archives and see if I can find the discussion. :)
no subject
Date: 11/10/06 02:07 pm (UTC)I don't remember ever thinking that Eugenides was going to kill her, but I wasn't expecting the marriage proposal either. (But I read QoA first, btw.) I guess I just assumed he'd take her to Eddis and there'd be a trial or something...whatever they did with queens they wanted to depose back then.
There was a discussion recently about when Eddis knew that Eugenides loved Attolia...I don't think anyone ever came to a final conclusion, but no one seemed to think that he told the whole council he loved Attolia. But Eddis knew right after that meeting, so either he told her after everyone left or she knew/figured it out a good deal earlier.
no subject
Date: 11/10/06 03:11 pm (UTC)I did, however, think that Eugenides might be going to steal Attolia in order to kill her. I thought he was very changed and might no longer have qualms about killing when it was necessary to save his country. I was floored by the conversation in the boat. The entire book shifted for me then, the same way the ending in Thief probably did for most readers. I read QoA first.
no subject
Date: 11/10/06 03:41 pm (UTC)I read reviews of QoA first so i knew Gen was going to try to marry her. I didn't guess that he loved her.
no subject
Date: 11/10/06 03:47 pm (UTC)My shifting-of-view in KoA, the first I read, though I had had suspicions before, was when the wounded Eugenides pulled the Queen to him and kissed her. It was a sort of "Aha! My suspicions are confirmed!" moment, when I rethought a lot of the things that had happened.
Leslie the Mad Poster
no subject
Date: 11/10/06 05:52 pm (UTC)i think people here are generally mad :P
the part that clinched it for me was after he said he wanted to marry her and after her sharp comment he flushed in the dark. that was when i was like, OMG really!?
no subject
Date: 11/11/06 01:16 am (UTC)I see we have sucked you into the black hole that is LJ Sounis. More addicting than crack.
no subject
Date: 11/11/06 09:50 am (UTC)*rubs hands together and cackles gleefully*
..Yup. It really is.
no subject
Date: 11/12/06 12:17 pm (UTC)Shame on you! Shame, I say!
Leslie
no subject
Date: 11/10/06 09:49 pm (UTC)But really, I can see how some people thinking it would be easier to kill her than make her love him! Not knowing what was going on in both of their heads.
no subject
Date: 11/11/06 12:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 11/10/06 06:05 pm (UTC)Of course, I was over that in about half a page...
-Philia
no subject
Date: 11/10/06 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 11/11/06 01:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 11/10/06 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 11/12/06 03:14 am (UTC)Here (http://mark.cracksandshards.com/Whom-peeves.html#serial_comma)'s my opinion on it.
Dr. Whom, Consulting Linguist, Grammarian, Orthoëpist, and Philological Busybody
no subject
Date: 11/12/06 03:22 am (UTC)I was asking this in the conspiracy room earlier--is it LETH-ee-um, or LEETH-ee-um? The narcotic made from poppies, that is. Which do you think?
no subject
Date: 11/12/06 12:21 pm (UTC)-Philia
no subject
Date: 11/13/06 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 11/12/06 11:48 am (UTC)However, while I agree that:
"hamburgers, hot dogs, and french fries" is the same as
"hamburgers, hot dogs and french fries,"
the sentence here seems different.
"block and tackle, roughly squared wooden beams, wooden carriages and cannon"
Maybe it's the repetition of "wooden." Or it might be the adjective in front of the penultimate noun. Let's see:
goldfish, compactly built fluffy guinea pigs, fluffy cats and dogs
goldfish, compactly built fluffy guinea pigs, fluffy cats, and dogs.
To me the first one indicates that both the cats and the dogs (as well as the guinea pigs, of course) are fluffy, but the second one indicates that the dogs aren't fluffy, or at least not necessarily.
I suppose that's it, actually: "wooden carriages and cannon" leaves the possibility that both the carriages and cannon are wooden, but "wooden carriages, and cannon" seems to divorce the cannon from the wooden. And since I didn't notice that the comma wasn't there, I was mentally separating the two, as well.
Leslie
no subject
Date: 11/12/06 03:53 pm (UTC)I didn't get that the cannons were wooden until Eugenides tells Attolia...
I love the part in QoA where Attolia has been kidnapped, and Eugenides comes into her tent...and she's totally not expecting him to kiss her and is furious when she does...
~Feir Dearig
no subject
Date: 11/12/06 03:54 pm (UTC)Oops.
~Feir Dearig