Theories

Jul. 8th, 2019 10:59 pm
[identity profile] drollittle.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] queensthief
I’ve been scrounging through past posts and comments looking for discussions of a few ideas and haven’t found quite what I was looking for, so here they are:

1. Back in The Thief, when Eugenides tells the Magus and company the stories of his god, he says that he leaves something out. Have we ever been told what he left out?
Kamet says that part of a tablet is missing from the story of Immakuk and Ennikar—the part that explains exactly how they stole the oil of immortality. Is it possible that these two missing pieces could be connected? Is there a reason why sandal-polisher Eugenides was so interested in Kamet’s Mede mythology? Did the god Eugenides help Immakuk and Ennikar steal (key word: steal) the oil of immortality and does said oil have anything to do with Hamiathes’ Gift?

2. When Kamet has to change his shirt in front of Costis he says something to the effect that “for a moment my secret was visible” (I don’t have the book in front of me now so that might not be an exact quote). On my first reading I assumed he meant the scars on his back from being whipped, but I think he had already said that the scars were visible at the neck of his shift, so maybe he has some other secret? For a few crazy hours I theorized that Kamet might be a woman—after all, the entire book is written in first person so he calls himself “I” not “he,” but then I found the line where he says “I could have been the most powerful man in the empire,” so that theory is probably not true. Any other ideas?

Date: 7/11/19 11:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rouan1.livejournal.com
Interesting theories. I could be wrong but my impression is that Gen told the Magus he had missed part of the legend. I am going to have to go back and re-read those sections again.

When Kamet said his secret was visible, I figured he meant the slave chain around his neck. He kept it covered so no one would see it and know he was an escaped slave.

I have a theory of my own about the upcoming book. Some of us have been theorizing that Eugenedies would end up dying in the last book. I am going to guess no on that. MWT stated in an interview about QoA that she liked to get the worst/bad events over in the early part of the book so she could get on with the story (I am paraphrasing so not her exact words). With that in mind, and since the last one is about the Return of the Thief, it doesn't make sense that she would kill him off. He's the main character; the book is about him; why would she write a book about a dead main character. Anyone else have thoughts on this?

Date: 7/12/19 07:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freenarnian.livejournal.com
*gets antsy anytime immortality or deification is mentioned/touched upon in this series* Please stay alive and human, everyone.

I remember wondering about Kamet's "secret" too, and coming to the conclusion that it could mean his scars or collar, as already mentioned, OR something yet to be revealed. One just never knows with MWT. I can't read TaT without the niggling sensation that there are still things I'm not catching.

Date: 7/13/19 04:25 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Oh, Gen had better not die, not permanently anyway! The word “return” in the title makes me wonder if maybe he leaves (to the underworld?), and is considered dead, and then comes back. He could pull an epic Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn, and drop in on his own funeral :D

The only way immortality or deification would make me happy would be if Gen and Irene achieve it together. Then they could throw divine ink pots at each other for eternity, and no one would be lonely.

Kamet’s secret could have been the chain, I hadn’t thought of that. I still kind of like imagining that it’s something yet to be explained.
Page generated Mar. 13th, 2026 11:58 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios