![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I feel like maybe we've discussed this before but, well, we like talking about the same things again sometimes, right?
So recently I read a book which was OK, but I didn't love. When trying to figure out what exactly wasn't working for me, I realized one of the big issues I had--I felt like the author was trying to make one of the main characters into a Gen-type character, but was failing.
(To be completely honest, my first thought was, "This book would just be so much better if it was about Lord Peter instead." I think I'm due for a LPW re-read.)
So I started trying to figure out why I felt like the character failed to live up to the "Gen" type.
I started by trying to think of successful Gen-type characters. I know some are missing from this list, but these are the first I came up with--
Gen (obviously)
Lord Peter Wimsey
Sir Percy (the Scarlet Pimpernel)
Miles Vorkosigan
Chrestomanci
the Doctor
My list stopped there, even though I KNOW that I've read other books with this character type--help me out here, guys.
Then, I tried to decide what characteristics made this mold. The characters I listed above fit most or all of these characteristics:
clever and witty--quick thinking
intelligent--long term thinking
people skills--good at reading and understanding people
Aristocratic/privileged background, usually with a sense of style to go with it
Brave--sometimes in almost a daredevil way
Stick to a code/personal beliefs
Sometimes works in disguise or with another identity (not always literally)
That's all I have so far.
So what I'd be curious to discuss are these questions:
What other characters would you add to this list, and why do you think they fit? (Particularly if they're from books I haven't read ;-) Would you take away any I listed?
What characteristics would you add to this list--or take away from it?
Why do you think this character type appears repeatedly?
So recently I read a book which was OK, but I didn't love. When trying to figure out what exactly wasn't working for me, I realized one of the big issues I had--I felt like the author was trying to make one of the main characters into a Gen-type character, but was failing.
(To be completely honest, my first thought was, "This book would just be so much better if it was about Lord Peter instead." I think I'm due for a LPW re-read.)
So I started trying to figure out why I felt like the character failed to live up to the "Gen" type.
I started by trying to think of successful Gen-type characters. I know some are missing from this list, but these are the first I came up with--
Gen (obviously)
Lord Peter Wimsey
Sir Percy (the Scarlet Pimpernel)
Miles Vorkosigan
Chrestomanci
the Doctor
My list stopped there, even though I KNOW that I've read other books with this character type--help me out here, guys.
Then, I tried to decide what characteristics made this mold. The characters I listed above fit most or all of these characteristics:
clever and witty--quick thinking
intelligent--long term thinking
people skills--good at reading and understanding people
Aristocratic/privileged background, usually with a sense of style to go with it
Brave--sometimes in almost a daredevil way
Stick to a code/personal beliefs
Sometimes works in disguise or with another identity (not always literally)
That's all I have so far.
So what I'd be curious to discuss are these questions:
What other characters would you add to this list, and why do you think they fit? (Particularly if they're from books I haven't read ;-) Would you take away any I listed?
What characteristics would you add to this list--or take away from it?
Why do you think this character type appears repeatedly?
no subject
Date: 12/15/14 04:36 am (UTC)I like The Sherwood Ring, and Pope's (only?) other book, The Perilous Gard. I'm a filker (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filk_music), and I wanted to hear the song that Randal was writing in the last chapter, so I wrote it. :-)
no subject
Date: 12/15/14 02:38 pm (UTC)